Do Enlightened Beings Cry? Understanding Grief, Sorrow, and Sadness
Updated: Aug 30
One of the common misunderstandings about Enlightenment is the belief that an Enlightened being would still experience grief, sorrow, or sadness when someone close to them dies, but would simply experience those emotions in a calmer or more controlled way.
That is not an accurate understanding of Enlightenment.
An Enlightened being does not experience grief, sorrow, sadness, or other discontented mental states because the causes that produce those mental states have been completely eliminated.
This does not mean that an Enlightened being is incapable of loving-kindness, compassion, appreciation, or care for another person. Nor does it mean that the body becomes incapable of producing tears.
The important distinction is between the physical production of tears and crying that arises because the mind is experiencing grief, sorrow, or sadness.
To understand this clearly, we need to understand Impermanence, craving/clinging, The Four Noble Truths, and The Path that leads to the elimination of discontentedness.
Table of Contents
Death Is an Event
The death of someone close to you does not produce sadness.
The death is an event.
What determines whether sadness, grief, or sorrow arise is the condition of the mind responding to that event, based on whether craving/clinging is present in the mind or not.
When craving/clinging is present, the mind wants the individual to remain. The mind desires for something that is impermanent to be permanent.
When that individual dies, reality is no longer in accordance with what the mind desires. The mind “wants” the person to remain, but the person has died. That conflict between reality and the mind's craving can produce sadness, grief, or sorrow.
Therefore, the death itself did not cause the sadness.
The craving/clinging within the mind caused the sadness in response to the death.
This distinction is essential.
The sequence is not:
Love → Death → Grief → Tears
The more accurate sequence is:
Craving / Clinging → Death or Change → Sadness / Grief / Sorrow → Tears
The craving/clinging was already present before the death occurred. The death creates the circumstance in which the existing craving/clinging produces sadness, grief, or sorrow because the mind wants the individual to remain permanent.
The Universal Truth of Impermanence
Everything that arises is impermanent.
People are impermanent.
Bodies are impermanent.
Relationships are impermanent.
Circumstances are impermanent.
Every conditioned experience arises, changes, and eventually ceases.
The problem is not that impermanent things change or cease. That is simply their nature as part of The Natural Laws of Existence.
The problem of discontentedness arises when the mind craves or clings to something impermanent and wants it to remain permanent.
A Practitioner needs to develop the ability of knowing and seeing as impermanent.
A Practitioner may understand intellectually that every person will eventually die while still maintaining craving/clinging toward particular people.
The mind may think:
“I know everyone dies, but I do not want this person to die.”
“I want this person to remain in my life.”
“I want this person to continue being here.”
That is where the conflict arises that produces discontentedness.
Reality operates according to The Universal Truth of Impermanence.
The unEnlightened mind wants reality to conform to its desires.
When reality inevitably changes, craving/clinging will produce sadness, grief, sorrow, frustration, anger, fear, or other forms of discontentedness.
An Enlightened being no longer has that craving/clinging.
Therefore, when something impermanent changes or ceases, the mind does not demand that it should have remained.
You Have Not Actually “Lost” the Person
It is common to describe someone's death by saying:
“I lost someone.”
But this way of thinking can reinforce the idea that the individual somehow belonged to us.
In reality, the person never belonged to us.
They were never our possession.
We had the benefit and opportunity of having that individual in our life for a period of time.
We may have shared experiences with them.
We may have learned from them.
We may have cared for one another.
We may have benefited greatly from their presence.
But none of this made the individual ours to possess.
That person was always an impermanent being living according to causes and conditions of the natural laws.
When death occurs, we have not had something that belonged to us taken away.
An impermanent life has simply reached its end. Because they were born, they had to die. This is impermanence.
Understanding this does not diminish our appreciation for another person. Instead, it removes the craving/clinging that wants the individual or relationship to remain permanent when, in reality, both are impermanent. When death or change occurs, a mind free from craving/clinging does not need to experience sadness, grief, or sorrow.
Love Does Not Produce Grief
Another widespread misunderstanding is the belief that grief is evidence of love.
People may say:
“You are grieving because you loved that person.”
But love does not produce grief.
Craving/clinging produces grief.
Loving-kindness does not require the mind to possess another person. Compassion does not require the mind to demand that another person remain permanently. This is an important distinction because an unEnlightened mind frequently combines caring with craving/clinging, mistakenly believing they are the same thing or that craving/clinging itself is love.
A person can deeply appreciate another individual and genuinely care about their wellbeing while practicing true love without attachment.
The two become so intertwined that people begin to assume they are the same thing.
They are not.
An Enlightened being can possess loving-kindness and compassion in the mind without craving/clinging.
Therefore, the absence of grief does not demonstrate an absence of love.
It demonstrates the absence of craving/clinging.
The Second Noble Truth Explains the Cause
The Four Noble Truths provide the framework for understanding this process.
The First Noble Truth teaches the existence of discontentedness.
Grief, sorrow, sadness, lamentation, mental anguish, and similar states are forms of mental discontentedness.
The Second Noble Truth explains that discontentedness has a cause.
That cause is craving.
The Buddha explains that craving/desire is the root of discontentedness.
This means we should not attribute grief to an external event.
The external event is not the ultimate cause.
The death of another person does not enter the mind and mechanically create grief.
Rather, the mind responds to the event according to its own condition.
If craving/clinging is present, discontentedness will arise.
If craving/clinging has been eliminated, the discontentedness does not arise.
This is why two individuals can experience the same death yet respond very differently.
The event may be identical.
The condition of the minds is not.
One mind can have intense craving/clinging and experience profound grief.
Another may have less craving/clinging and experience less grief.
An Enlightened being has eliminated craving completely.
Therefore, the cause necessary for grief to arise is absent.
Because an Enlightened being has no craving/clinging, there is no grief. However, loving-kindness, compassion, care, and appreciation for all beings remain.
The Third Noble Truth: The Elimination of Discontentedness
The Third Noble Truth teaches that discontentedness can be eliminated.
This point is particularly important when discussing grief and sadness.
The Buddha was not merely teaching Practitioners how to become better at tolerating grief.
The goal is not to become skilled at living with sadness.
The goal is not to suppress sorrow while pretending everything is fine.
The goal is the elimination of the cause that produces discontentedness.
When craving is completely eliminated, the discontented states dependent upon craving can no longer arise.
Therefore, an Enlightened being does not experience grief, sorrow, or sadness.
If these states continued to arise after Enlightenment, then discontentedness would not actually have been eliminated and the individual is not experiencing Enlightenment.
This is why saying that an Enlightened being continues to experience grief but simply “does not cling to it” creates a contradiction.
If grief is present, discontentedness is present.
Enlightenment is not the ability to experience grief without clinging to the grief. Enlightenment is the elimination of the craving/clinging that would cause grief to arise in the first place.
If discontentedness is present because of craving/clinging, then the cause has not yet been completely eliminated.
An Enlightened being has eliminated the cause.
The Fourth Noble Truth: The Path That Eliminates the Cause
The Fourth Noble Truth teaches The Eight Fold Path—the Path that leads to the elimination of discontentedness.
The Practitioner develops Right View and learns to understand reality accurately.
This includes understanding Impermanence and recognizing that craving for impermanent people, possessions, circumstances, and experiences to remain permanent will produce discontentedness.
Through Right Mindfulness, the Practitioner learns to observe what is occurring within the body and mind.
When attachment, longing, fear, sadness, or other reactions begin to arise, the Practitioner develops the ability to recognize these states rather than blindly becoming consumed by them.
Through Right Effort, the Practitioner works to eliminate unwholesome mental states and prevent them from continuing to develop.
Over time, through diligent practice of The Eight Fold Path, craving is weakened and eventually eliminated.
When craving is completely eliminated, the mind no longer demands permanence from an impermanent world.
That is why the Enlightened being does not grieve when death occurs.
Why Grief Can Produce Tears
Crying caused by grief should be understood as part of this same chain of cause and effect.
The death does not directly produce the tears.
Love does not directly produce the tears.
Rather:
Craving / Clinging → Death or Change → Sadness / Grief / Sorrow → Tears
The mind is craving for the individual to remain.
The person dies.
Because the mind wants reality to be different from what it is, sadness, grief, or sorrow can arise.
Those discontented mental states can then produce the bodily response of crying and tears.
Therefore:
Love does not cause the tears.
Death does not cause the tears.
Craving/clinging produces the discontented mental state that can then produce the tears.
This is the distinction that is often overlooked.
Can an Enlightened Being Produce Tears?
Yes.
An Enlightened being still has a functioning human body.
The eyes and tear glands continue to operate according to physical causes and conditions.
Tears could arise because of eye irritation, dust, wind, smoke, allergies, dry eyes, yawning, or another physiological condition.
Tears could also arise in connection with joy.
But an Enlightened being would not cry because of grief, sorrow, sadness, or another discontented mental state.
The body remains capable of producing tears.
The mind is no longer capable of producing the discontented mental conditions that would cause crying from grief, sorrow, or sadness.
That distinction is important.
Compassion Does Not Require Sadness
Some people find this teaching difficult because they equate sadness with compassion.
They may think:
“If an Enlightened being does not become sad when someone dies, doesn't that mean they do not care?”
No.
Compassion does not require discontentedness.
Compassion (Pāli: karuṇā) is concern for the misfortunes of others.
An Enlightened being can recognize that other people are experiencing grief.
They can understand the difficulties another person is facing.
They can respond with loving-kindness, compassion, wisdom, patience, and assistance.
But they do not need to produce discontentedness within their own mind in order to help another person.
Becoming sad because another person is sad does not remove the other person's sadness.
It simply creates another mind experiencing discontentedness.
An Enlightened being can care deeply while maintaining clarity of mind.
Enlightenment Is Freedom from the Cause
The important point is not merely that an Enlightened being behaves differently around death.
The mind itself has been transformed.
Craving has been eliminated.
Clinging has been eliminated.
The desire for impermanent people and circumstances to remain permanent has been eliminated.
Therefore, the mental states dependent upon those causes no longer arise. An Enlightened being is incapable of experiencing grief or sadness because the causes that produce it have been eliminated.
An Enlightened being can appreciate another person without possessing them.
An Enlightened being can express loving-kindness without craving.
An Enlightened being can possess compassion without sadness.
An Enlightened being can experience the death of someone close to them without grief or sorrow.
And while the body remains capable of producing tears through natural physiological causes, the Enlightened being does not cry because of sadness, grief, or sorrow.
The sequence is not:
Love → Death → Grief → Tears
The more accurate sequence is:
Craving / Clinging → Death or Change → Sadness / Grief / Sorrow → Tears
Remove craving/clinging, and the chain leading to grief is broken.
This is not emotional coldness.
It is not indifference.
It is not suppression.
It is freedom from the cause of discontentedness.
The absence of grief does not indicate the absence of love. It indicates the absence of craving/clinging.
David Roylance is a dedicated Practitioner, Teacher, and published author who has taught The Teachings of The Buddha since 2005. Based in Chiang Mai, Thailand, he guides Household and Ordained Practitioners worldwide through courses, retreats, and special events on The Path to Enlightenment.
Comments